The effect of green marketing mix on the behavioral dimensions of green brand equity of sports products

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD. student of Sports Management Department, Karaj Branch, Salami Azad University, Karaj, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Sports Management, Karaj Branch, Salami Azad University, Karaj, Iran

3 Professor of Sports Management Department, Karaj Branch, Salami Azad University, Karaj, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Sports movement behavior, Karaj Branch, Salami Azad University, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Abstract
In response to increasing environmental concerns and, at the same time, increasing brand equity, companies have focused their efforts on providing environmentally friendly products and services. Sports are no exception to this rule. Because the owners of sports brands have realized that if they are responsible for the environment, they will receive a better response from their customers. At the same time, they have realized that if they take care of the environmental concerns of their customers, they are more likely to choose the products and services provided by the respective company. Therefore, these companies have actively pursued sustainable marketing strategies such as green marketing. Despite that, no study has estimated the effect of a green marketing mix on the behavioral dimensions of the special value of the green brand of sports products. This study is survey research supported by post-positivist worldview considerations and assumptions. According to the nature of the study, the current research approach is explanation and prediction, mainly done to investigate the statistical inference of path coefficients, effect sizes, and the predictive performance of the model and prediction errors. The data to test the hypotheses in this study were collected through an online self-report survey made available to Majid brand customers. Based on this, 394 questionnaires were collected. 51.9% of the examined samples were men, and 48.1% were women, ages 18 and 53. The measurement tools were selected based on the existing literature that was previously adapted to the diverse context of green marketing and the dimensions of green brand equity. Then the necessary modifications were made to adapt it to the current research field. The questionnaire consisted of two parts: the first part was dedicated to personal information and demographic characteristics, the second part was dedicated to the research variables, and finally, to test the hypotheses of this study, partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM-3) was used. ) used. The present study showed that green products positively affect a green image, satisfaction, trust and loyalty. Green price positively and significantly affects the green image, trust, and loyalty. On the other hand, the green price has no significant effect on green satisfaction. Green place only has a positive and significant effect on the green image and does not significantly affect green satisfaction, green trust and loyalty. Green promotion simultaneously has a positive and significant effect on the green image and green satisfaction. On the other hand, green promotion has no significant effect on green trust and loyalty. Finally, by evaluating the internal relationships of the special value dimensions of the green brand of sports products, this study showed that the causal relationship of green image with green trust, green image with green loyalty, and green trust with green loyalty is a positive sign. But there is no significant causal relationship between green image and green satisfaction, green satisfaction with green trust and green satisfaction with green loyalty. In general, the findings of this study show that customers accept cost-benefit analyses about sports products. Because by estimating the strengths and weaknesses of the alternatives, they have concluded that green products have significantly saved their money and time. Also, with the cost-benefit analysis, it was found that the customers of the Majid brand do not consider the mentioned brand affordable in terms of access. As a result, they refuse to make an emotional and long-term commitment to the mentioned brand. Therefore, Majid Company, which devotes a small part of its production to green products, is suggested to design a road map for the marketing of their green products, in which they focus on maintaining the current price, diversifying the lines of green products, improving the design and Easy access is emphasized as a strategic and operational policy of the company. It is also suggested that this company strengthen the level of promotion and access to its products through the actions mentioned in the text because it was found that there is a gap between what the company offers and what the customer receives and understands. On the other hand, it is not easy to access the products of this company, and their level of trust in what the company advertises is not very high. In the end, it is necessary to mention some limitations of this research. The first limitation is that the green marketing mix is not simply summarized in the four dimensions examined in this study. Another limitation is that this study studied the behavioral dimension of customers' green brand equity, and the perceptual dimension of customer brand equity was not measured and evaluated. The third limitation is that the responses were received from Majid brand customers, who limits the generalization of the findings to other brands and customers. Finally, in this research, an online survey was used, known as easy sampling, and the selected samples may not be representative of all customers of the Majid brand. Therefore, future researchers are suggested to investigate the effect of mixed green marketing on the special value of the green brand, in addition to the dimensions presented in this research, also to examine other dimensions and conduct such a study for other sports brands.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Agustini, M., Baloran, A., Bagano, A., Tan, A., Athanasius, S., & Retnawati, B. (2021). Green marketing practices and issues: A comparative study of selected firms in Indonesia and Philippines. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 22(3), 164-181.
Becker, J.-M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Völckner, F. (2015). How collinearity affects mixture regression results. Marketing Letters, 26, 643-659.
Bekk, M., Spörrle, M., Hedjasie, R., & Kerschreiter, R. (2016). Greening the competitive advantage: antecedents and consequences of green brand equity. Quality & Quantity, 50, 1727-1746.
Belz, F.-M., & Peattie, K. (2009). Sustainability marketing. Wiley & Sons Glasgow, Hoboken.
Buruoshak, H., Khalifeh, S. N., Noorbakhash, M., & Noorbakhsh, P. (2022). Explaining The Effect of Social Marketing on Motivating Sports Participation of The Elderly in East Azarbaijan Province. Sports Marketing Studies, 3(3), 220-187.
Chen, Y.-S. (2010). The drivers of green brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. Journal of Business ethics, 93, 307-319.
Davari, A., & Strutton, D. (2014). Marketing mix strategies for closing the gap between green consumers' pro-environmental beliefs and behaviors. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 22(7), 563-586.
Gelderman, C. J., Schijns, J., Lambrechts, W., & Vijgen, S. (2021). Green marketing as an environmental practice: The impact on green satisfaction and green loyalty in a business‐to‐business context. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 2061-2076.
Ghasemy, M., Teeroovengadum, V., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2020). This fast car can move faster: A review of PLS-SEM application in higher education research. Higher education, 80(6), 1121-1152.
Hadizadehmoghadam, A., JamailKepak, S., & Mosavi, S. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of green brand equity. Journal OF Business Management perspective, 10, 31-51. [in Persian] 
 Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24.
Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. saGe publications.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43, 115-135.
Herrmann, A., Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Huber, F. (2007). The influence of price fairness on customer satisfaction: an empirical test in the context of automobile purchases. Journal of product & brand management, 16(1), 49-58.
Ishaq, M. I., & Di Maria, E. (2020). Sustainability countenance in brand equity: A critical review and future research directions. Journal of Brand Management, 27(1), 15-34.
Kang, S., & Hur, W. M. (2012). Investigating the antecedents of green brand equity: a sustainable development perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(5), 306-316.
Katrandjiev, H. (2016). Ecological marketing, green marketing, sustainable marketing: Synonyms оr аn evolution оf ideas. Economic Alternatives, 1(7), 71-82.
Khandelwal, U., Kulshreshtha, K., & Tripathi, V. (2019). Importance of consumer-based green brand equity: Empirical evidence. Paradigm, 23(1), 83-97.
Kontogianni, E., Zafeiroudi, A., & Kouthouris, C. (2020). Integrating green marketing issues in water sport recreation activities. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Management, 7(1), 44-54.
Martin, D. M., & Schouten, J. (2011). Sustainable marketing. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Martínez, P. (2015). Customer loyalty: Exploring its antecedents from a green marketing perspective. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(5), 896-917.
Mourad, M., & Serag Eldin Ahmed, Y. (2012). Perception of green brand in an emerging innovative market. European journal of innovation management, 15(4), 514-537.
Mukonza, C., & Swarts, I. (2020). The influence of green marketing strategies on business performance and corporate image in the retail sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 838-845.
Nguyen-Viet, B. (2023). The impact of green marketing mix elements on green customer based brand equity in an emerging market. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 15(1), 96-116.
Nguyen Viet, B., & Nguyen Anh, T. (2021). The role of selected marketing mix elements in consumer based brand equity creation: milk industry in Vietnam. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 27(2), 72-88.
Olsen, M. C., Slotegraaf, R. J., & Chandukala, S. R. (2014). Green claims and message frames: How green new products change brand attitude. Journal of Marketing, 78(5), 119-137.
Rahbar, E., & Wahid, N. A. (2011). Investigation of green marketing tools' effect on consumers' purchase behavior. Business strategy series, 12(2), 73-83.
Shahvali kohshouri, J., Askari, A., Mostahfezian,, M., & Hadiseh, B. (2022). Examining The Environmental Behaviors of Sports Consumers: The Effect of Green Marketing Tools. Sports Marketing Studies, 3(4), 117-96.
Sohail, M. S. (2017). Green marketing strategies: how do they influence consumer-based brand equity? Journal for Global Business Advancement, 10(3), 229-243.
Tan, Z., Sadiq, B., Bashir, T., Mahmood, H., & Rasool, Y. (2022). Investigating the Impact of Green Marketing Components on Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Brand Image and Brand Trust. Sustainability, 14(10), 5939.
Tsai, P.-H., Lin, G.-Y., Zheng, Y.-L., Chen, Y.-C., Chen, P.-Z., & Su, Z.-C. (2020). Exploring the effect of Starbucks' green marketing on consumers' purchase decisions from consumers’ perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 56, 102162.
Wu, L., & Liu, Z. (2022). The influence of Green Marketing on Brand Trust: The mediation role of Brand Image and the moderation effect of greenwash. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022.
Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lee, S. (2000). An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 28(2), 195-211.