اندازه گیری روایی و پایایی مقیاس کنجکاوی هواداران ورزشی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه کردستان

2 دبیر درس تربیت بدنی - آموزش و پرورش ناحیه 2 سنندج

3 دانشگاه سویلیا

چکیده

تحقیق حاضر روی دو بعد از کنجکاوی تمرکز دارد و هدف این پژوهش ایجاد مقیاس اندازه‌گیری معتبر و قابل اعتماد برای کنجکاوی‌های خاص هواداران ورزشی است. بنابراین از دو مطالعه، مطالعه شماره یک (شامل چهار مرحله) و مطالعه شماره دو (شامل دو مرحله) برای ایجاد مقیاس حس کنجکاوی خاص هواداران ورزشی استفاده شده است. داده‌های تحقیق از میان دو نمونه داده (نمونه شماره یک شامل 303 نفر و نمونه شماره دو 250 نفر) و از میان دانشجویان، دانش‌آموخته‌ها، کارشناسان و دبیران تربیت بدنی استان کردستان جمع‌آوری شد. از تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و تحلیل عاملی تأییدی برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها به وسیله نرم افزار ایموس استفاده شد. در نهایت سه عامل که شامل 15 سؤال بود برای مقیاس نهایی به دست آمد. عامل یک (اطلاعات خاص، 9 سؤال)، عامل دو (اطلاعات عمومی، 3 سؤال) و عامل سه (اطلاعات اماکن و تأسیسات ورزشی، 3 سؤال). کنجکاوی خاص هوادار ورزشی پتانسیل این را دارد تا کمک کند بهتر درک کنیم چرا و چگونه هواداران به هواداران وفادار ورزشی تبدیل می‌شوند. همچنین می‌تواند بر هواداران و غیر هواداران مختلف تأثیر بگذارد و با تحقیق‌های قبلی ترکیب شود و کمک کند تا رفتار هواداران ورزشی را بهتر درک شود. مطالعه موجود یک گام مهم برای درک بهتر حس کنجکاوی خاص هوادار و تأثیر آن است، اما هنوز برای رسیدن به فهم و درک کامل، کار بیشتری مورد نیاز است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Measure the validity and reliability of the curiosity of sports fans

نویسندگان [English]

  • sardar mohamadi 1
  • Khaled Solaimany 2
  • Jeronimo Garsia Fernandez 3
1 Full Professor of Sports Management, University of Kurdistan
2 Secretary of Physical Education - Education District 2 Sanandaj
3 University of Seville
چکیده [English]

Abstract
One of the most important components that make the sports industry appear important and valuable is sports fans because they play an important role in this industry. Sports fans are defined as people who have special attention and interest in sports, broadcasting it or following their favorite team (Wann, 2002). In recent years, sports fans have had an increasing influence on the sports industry, because they are no longer passive consumers, but are becoming forward-looking consumers. Despite this fact, there are a significant number of researches on the social, personal, and psychological factors affecting the types of fan behavior related to sports, sports teams, and players, and most of the existing literature emphasizes the loyal and well-known fan. Since the current sports market has become highly competitive (Mahony &. Howard, 2001), sports marketers need loyal sports fans and a fan base to generate new fans. Therefore, both researchers and marketers working in this profession need to understand why consumers are attracted to sports in the first place. One of the factors that have a high potential to explain the cognitive, sensory, psychological, and situational effects on the behaviors of sports fans is curiosity (Mahony et al., 2001). Curiosity is defined as "the desire to acquire new knowledge and new sensory experience that stimulates exploratory behavior". One of the most important early researches in the field of curiosity was done by Berlyne. He believes that curiosity is a strong motivation that leads people to behave and discover different environments. In their research, Park et al (2015) found that increasing understanding of the impact of curiosity and knowledge gaps in sports consumers may be beneficial. Mehmet & Oktay (2019) pointed out in their research that statistically significant differences were found between the specific curiosity levels of students in sports in terms of gender, department, family participation in sports, and monthly expenses in the university. The purpose of this research is to create a valid and reliable measurement scale for the specific curiosities of sports fans. This research has developed the special curiosity scale of sports fans in two studies. Study 1 included four steps for scale development. In particular, the structural dimension of specific curiosity was used for the use of research literature at this stage. In the second stage, sample questions that reflected the structure were developed. In the third step, the data (sample one) was collected through an online questionnaire and among sports enthusiasts (303 people), which included physical education students of different educational levels, sports teachers, and physical education graduates. In the fourth step, the validity and reliability of the questions were tested using exploratory factor analysis. Study two included two stages (stages five and six). In stage five, the second set of data (sample two) was collected from 250 physical education experts. Since the authors carefully measured the curiosity of sports fans in this study, they tried to check the questionnaire of people who are currently sports fans. The sports fan questionnaire, which is a valid and reliable scale, includes five questions (for example, being a sports fan is very important to me) and was used based on a seven-point Likert scale to evaluate the level of fandom of the participants. In the sixth step, various statistical analyzes were performed to check the reliability and validity of the SFSCS questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to analyze the data using Amos software. Finally, three factors; Specific information (9 questions), general information (3 questions), and information on sports facilities and facilities (3 questions) were obtained for the final scale. There are several implications based on recent research findings. First, developing the level of curiosity of sports fans is an important step in this research and can be used in various sports topics. According to the findings of Churchill (1979) and Netemeyer et al (2003), to have a theoretical background and generate new knowledge, the existence of a valid and reliable measurement scale is necessary. However, the work of Park et al (2010) has provided insights into understanding fan exploratory curiosity behavior, a measure previously lacking in sports fan-specific curiosity. The SFSCS scale provides sport management researchers with a summary and fluid measure to explore this concept in the future. Due to the unique nature of sports, using the SFSCS scale is a much more effective tool than other specific curiosity scales. Additionally, since previous research on curiosity in sports has focused on new sport-based behaviors, it has broader applications. The special curiosity of sports fans has the potential to understand why and how fans become loyal sports fans. Specific curiosity can affect different fans and non-fans and can be combined with previous research and help us to better understand the behavior of sports fans. The existing study is an important step to better understanding fan-specific curiosity and its impact, but more work is still needed to achieve a full understanding. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: curiosity
  • scale
  • Sports fans
  • Validity and reliability
Churchill Jr, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of marketing research16(1), 64-73.‏
Funk, D.C., Mahony, D.F., & Ridinger, L. (2002). Characterizing consumer motivation as individual difference factors". Augmenting the Sport Interest Inventory (SII) to explain specific sport interest. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 11 (1), 33–43.
Harvey, M., M., Leonard, N., & Payne, D. (2007). The role of curiosity in global manager’s decision-making. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(3), 46–61
Ismaili, S., Samadi, P, & Esmaeili, M. (1396). Explaining the concept of curiosity and its role in enhancing memory and enhancing learning skills. The First National Congress of Students of New Research in Psychology, University of Guilan, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, 34 [In Persean].
Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Fincham, F. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of personality assessment82(3), 291-305.‏
Litman, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (2003). Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. Journal of personality assessment80(1), 75-86.‏
Mahony, D. F., & Howard, D. R. (2001). Sport business in the next decade: A general overview of expected trends. Journal of sport management15(4), 275-296.‏
Yildirim, M., & Çoban, O. (2019). The Analysis of Students' Special Curiosity in Sports Based on Some Demographic Variables. Journal of Education and Training Studies7(3), 50-57.‏
Menon, S., & Soman, D. (2002). Managing the power of curiosity for effective web advertising strategies. Journal of Advertising31(3), 1-14.‏
Park, S. H., Mahony, D. F., Kim, Y., & Do Kim, Y. (2015). Curiosity generating advertisements and their impact on sport consumer behavior. Sport Management Review, 18(3), 359-369.‏
Park, S. H., Mahony, D. F., & Greenwell, T. C. (2010). The measurement of sport fan exploratory curiosity. Journal of sport management24(4), 434-455.‏
Park, S.H. (2007). Sport fan curiosity. Korean Journal of Sport Science, 18,173–184
Reio Jr, T. G., Petrosko, J. M., Wiswell, A. K., & Thongsukmag, J. (2006). The measurement and conceptualization of curiosity. The Journal of Genetic Psychology167(2), 117-135.‏
Samadi, P., Mitra, G, (1393). Curiosity-based education: A new approach to teaching-learning, The first national conference on education and psychology, Marvdasht, Young and innovative developer, 43, [In Persean].
Warm, D. L. (2002). Preliminary validation of a measure for assessing identification as a sport fan: The Sport Fandom Questionnaire. International Journal of Sport Management3, 103-115.‏